The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1071/es19035 →Countries where authors are citing The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5
This map shows the geographic impact of The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5
This network shows the impact of The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5.
About The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5
This paper, published in 2020, received 387 indexed citations . Written by Tilo Ziehn, Matthew A. Chamberlain, R. M. Law, Andrew Lenton, Roger Bodman, Martin Dix, Lauren Stevens, Ying‐Ping Wang and Jhan Srbinovsky covering the research area of Environmental Chemistry and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (325 citations), Atmospheric Science (238 citations) and Oceanography (108 citations). Published in Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth System Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1071/es19035.