Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review

872 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2008, received 872 indexed citations. Written by K. A. Beauchemin, Michael Kreuzer, F.P. O’Mara and Tim A. McAllister covering the research area of Soil Science and Agronomy and Crop Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Agronomy and Crop Science (710 citations), Ecology (315 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (145 citations). Published in Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1071/ea07199 →

Countries where authors are citing Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1071/ea07199.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026