From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1068/b2684 →Countries where authors are citing From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space
This map shows the geographic impact of From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space more than expected).
Fields of papers citing From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space
This network shows the impact of From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space.
About From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space
This paper, published in 2001, received 609 indexed citations . Written by Alasdair Turner, David O’Sullivan and Alan Penn covering the research area of Building and Construction, Automotive Engineering and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Building and Construction (480 citations), Global and Planetary Change (198 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (157 citations). Published in Environment and Planning B Planning and Design.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1068/b2684.