Resonant tunneling through quantum wells at frequencies up to 2.5 THz

789 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1983, received 789 indexed citations. Written by T. C. L. G. Sollner, W. D. Goodhue, P. E. Tannenwald, C. D. Parker and D. D. Peck covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (701 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (543 citations) and Materials Chemistry (55 citations). Published in Applied Physics Letters.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1063/1.94434 →

Countries where authors are citing Resonant tunneling through quantum wells at frequencies up to 2.5 THz

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Resonant tunneling through quantum wells at frequencies up to 2.5 THz. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Resonant tunneling through quantum wells at frequencies up to 2.5 THz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Resonant tunneling through quantum wells at frequencies up to 2.5 THz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Resonant tunneling through quantum wells at frequencies up to 2.5 THz

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Resonant tunneling through quantum wells at frequencies up to 2.5 THz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Resonant tunneling through quantum wells at frequencies up to 2.5 THz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1063/1.94434.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026