Natural bond orbital analysis of near-Hartree–Fock water dimer

2.7k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1983, received 2.7k indexed citations. Written by Alan E. Reed and Frank Weinhold covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (1.4k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (748 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (727 citations). Published in The Journal of Chemical Physics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1063/1.445134 →

Countries where authors are citing Natural bond orbital analysis of near-Hartree–Fock water dimer

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natural bond orbital analysis of near-Hartree–Fock water dimer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natural bond orbital analysis of near-Hartree–Fock water dimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural bond orbital analysis of near-Hartree–Fock water dimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Natural bond orbital analysis of near-Hartree–Fock water dimer

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Natural bond orbital analysis of near-Hartree–Fock water dimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Natural bond orbital analysis of near-Hartree–Fock water dimer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1063/1.445134.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026