New developments in the polarizable continuum model for quantum mechanical and classical calculations on molecules in solution
Abstract
loading...
About
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1063/1.1480445 →Countries where authors are citing New developments in the polarizable continuum model for quantum mechanical and classical calculations on molecules in solution
This map shows the geographic impact of New developments in the polarizable continuum model for quantum mechanical and classical calculations on molecules in solution. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by New developments in the polarizable continuum model for quantum mechanical and classical calculations on molecules in solution with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New developments in the polarizable continuum model for quantum mechanical and classical calculations on molecules in solution more than expected).
Fields of papers citing New developments in the polarizable continuum model for quantum mechanical and classical calculations on molecules in solution
This network shows the impact of New developments in the polarizable continuum model for quantum mechanical and classical calculations on molecules in solution. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the New developments in the polarizable continuum model for quantum mechanical and classical calculations on molecules in solution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1063/1.1480445.