Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure

1.5k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 1.5k indexed citations. Written by Nassir Marrouche, Johannes Brachmann, Dietrich Andresen, Jürgen Siebels, Lucas V.A. Boersma, Luc Jordaens, Béla Merkely, Evgeny Pokushalov, Prashanthan Sanders and Jochen Proff covering the research area of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.4k citations), Surgery (72 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (69 citations). Published in New England Journal of Medicine.

Countries where authors are citing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1707855.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026