Computational chemistry for water-splitting electrocatalysis
- Journal
- Chemical Society Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/d2cs01068b →Countries where authors are citing Computational chemistry for water-splitting electrocatalysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Computational chemistry for water-splitting electrocatalysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Computational chemistry for water-splitting electrocatalysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computational chemistry for water-splitting electrocatalysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Computational chemistry for water-splitting electrocatalysis
This network shows the impact of Computational chemistry for water-splitting electrocatalysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Computational chemistry for water-splitting electrocatalysis.
About Computational chemistry for water-splitting electrocatalysis
This paper, published in 2024, received 122 indexed citations . Written by Licheng Miao, Xuejie Cao and Lifang Jiao covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Materials Chemistry and Electrochemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (108 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (56 citations) and Materials Chemistry (39 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/d2cs01068b.