Fluorescent probes for the detection of chemical warfare agents

143 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2022, received 143 indexed citations. Written by Wenqi Meng, Adam C. Sedgwick, Nahyun Kwon, Mingxue Sun, Kai Xiao, Xiao‐Peng He, Eric V. Anslyn, Tony D. James and Juyoung Yoon covering the research area of Plant Science, Materials Chemistry and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (83 citations), Materials Chemistry (72 citations) and Plant Science (35 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.

Countries where authors are citing Fluorescent probes for the detection of chemical warfare agents

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fluorescent probes for the detection of chemical warfare agents. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fluorescent probes for the detection of chemical warfare agents with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fluorescent probes for the detection of chemical warfare agents more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Fluorescent probes for the detection of chemical warfare agents

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Fluorescent probes for the detection of chemical warfare agents. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fluorescent probes for the detection of chemical warfare agents.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/d2cs00650b.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026