Comparison and assessment of methods for cellulose crystallinity determination
- Journal
- Chemical Society Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/d2cs00569g →Countries where authors are citing Comparison and assessment of methods for cellulose crystallinity determination
This map shows the geographic impact of Comparison and assessment of methods for cellulose crystallinity determination. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Comparison and assessment of methods for cellulose crystallinity determination with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparison and assessment of methods for cellulose crystallinity determination more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Comparison and assessment of methods for cellulose crystallinity determination
This network shows the impact of Comparison and assessment of methods for cellulose crystallinity determination. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Comparison and assessment of methods for cellulose crystallinity determination.
About Comparison and assessment of methods for cellulose crystallinity determination
This paper, published in 2023, received 272 indexed citations . Written by Khandoker Samaher Salem, Nitesh Kasera, Md. Ashiqur Rahman, Hasan Jameel, Youssef Habibi, Stephen J. Eichhorn, Alfred D. French, Lokendra Pal and Lucian A. Lucia covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (156 citations), Biomedical Engineering (103 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (49 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/d2cs00569g.