Doping regulation in transition metal compounds for electrocatalysis
- Authors
- An ZhangYongxiang LiangHan ZhangZhigang GengJie Zeng
- Journal
- Chemical Society Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/d1cs00330e →Countries where authors are citing Doping regulation in transition metal compounds for electrocatalysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Doping regulation in transition metal compounds for electrocatalysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doping regulation in transition metal compounds for electrocatalysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doping regulation in transition metal compounds for electrocatalysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Doping regulation in transition metal compounds for electrocatalysis
This network shows the impact of Doping regulation in transition metal compounds for electrocatalysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Doping regulation in transition metal compounds for electrocatalysis.
About Doping regulation in transition metal compounds for electrocatalysis
This paper, published in 2021, received 496 indexed citations . Written by An Zhang, Yongxiang Liang, Han Zhang, Zhigang Geng and Jie Zeng covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (403 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (261 citations) and Materials Chemistry (199 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/d1cs00330e.