Carbon-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis
- Journal
- Chemical Society Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00905a →Countries where authors are citing Carbon-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis
This map shows the geographic impact of Carbon-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carbon-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carbon-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Carbon-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis
This network shows the impact of Carbon-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Carbon-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis.
About Carbon-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis
This paper, published in 2021, received 294 indexed citations . Written by Yanping Chen, Melis S. Duyar, Vitaly V. Ordomsky, Andreï Y. Khodakov and Jian Liu covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Catalysis (187 citations), Materials Chemistry (183 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (114 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00905a.