Robust superhydrophobicity: mechanisms and strategies
- Journal
- Chemical Society Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00751j →Countries where authors are citing Robust superhydrophobicity: mechanisms and strategies
This map shows the geographic impact of Robust superhydrophobicity: mechanisms and strategies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robust superhydrophobicity: mechanisms and strategies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robust superhydrophobicity: mechanisms and strategies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Robust superhydrophobicity: mechanisms and strategies
This network shows the impact of Robust superhydrophobicity: mechanisms and strategies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Robust superhydrophobicity: mechanisms and strategies.
About Robust superhydrophobicity: mechanisms and strategies
This paper, published in 2021, received 535 indexed citations . Written by Wenluan Zhang, Dehui Wang, Zhengnan Sun, Jia-Ning Song and Xu Deng covering the research area of Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surfaces, Coatings and Films (439 citations), Biomedical Engineering (216 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (112 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00751j.