Emerging new phase boundary in potassium sodium-niobate based ceramics

312 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2020, received 312 indexed citations. Written by Xiang Lv, Jianguo Zhu, Dingquan Xiao, Xixiang Zhang and Jiagang Wu covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (283 citations), Biomedical Engineering (202 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (176 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.

Countries where authors are citing Emerging new phase boundary in potassium sodium-niobate based ceramics

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emerging new phase boundary in potassium sodium-niobate based ceramics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emerging new phase boundary in potassium sodium-niobate based ceramics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emerging new phase boundary in potassium sodium-niobate based ceramics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Emerging new phase boundary in potassium sodium-niobate based ceramics

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Emerging new phase boundary in potassium sodium-niobate based ceramics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Emerging new phase boundary in potassium sodium-niobate based ceramics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/c9cs00432g.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026