Electrospun nanofiber reinforced composites: a review
- Journal
- Polymer Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/c8py00378e →Countries where authors are citing Electrospun nanofiber reinforced composites: a review
This map shows the geographic impact of Electrospun nanofiber reinforced composites: a review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Electrospun nanofiber reinforced composites: a review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electrospun nanofiber reinforced composites: a review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Electrospun nanofiber reinforced composites: a review
This network shows the impact of Electrospun nanofiber reinforced composites: a review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Electrospun nanofiber reinforced composites: a review.
About Electrospun nanofiber reinforced composites: a review
This paper, published in 2018, received 465 indexed citations . Written by Shaohua Jiang, Yiming Chen, Gaigai Duan, Changtong Mei, Andreas Greiner and Seema Agarwal covering the research area of Polymers and Plastics, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (301 citations), Biomedical Engineering (233 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (151 citations). Published in Polymer Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/c8py00378e.