Stability of amine-functionalized CO2 adsorbents: a multifaceted puzzle
- Journal
- Chemical Society Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00877a →Countries where authors are citing Stability of amine-functionalized CO2 adsorbents: a multifaceted puzzle
This map shows the geographic impact of Stability of amine-functionalized CO2 adsorbents: a multifaceted puzzle. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stability of amine-functionalized CO2 adsorbents: a multifaceted puzzle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stability of amine-functionalized CO2 adsorbents: a multifaceted puzzle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Stability of amine-functionalized CO2 adsorbents: a multifaceted puzzle
This network shows the impact of Stability of amine-functionalized CO2 adsorbents: a multifaceted puzzle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Stability of amine-functionalized CO2 adsorbents: a multifaceted puzzle.
About Stability of amine-functionalized CO2 adsorbents: a multifaceted puzzle
This paper, published in 2019, received 354 indexed citations . Written by Masoud Jahandar Lashaki and Abdelhamid Sayari covering the research area of Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanical Engineering (299 citations), Biomedical Engineering (115 citations) and Materials Chemistry (100 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00877a.