From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials
- Journal
- Chemical Society Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00688a →Countries where authors are citing From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials
This map shows the geographic impact of From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials more than expected).
Fields of papers citing From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials
This network shows the impact of From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials.
About From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials
This paper, published in 2018, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Angelo Kirchon, Liang Feng, Hannah F. Drake, Elizabeth Joseph and Hong‐Cai Zhou covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Inorganic Chemistry (905 citations), Materials Chemistry (736 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (194 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00688a.