Taming hazardous chemistry by continuous flow technology
- Journal
- Chemical Society Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00902b →Countries where authors are citing Taming hazardous chemistry by continuous flow technology
This map shows the geographic impact of Taming hazardous chemistry by continuous flow technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Taming hazardous chemistry by continuous flow technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Taming hazardous chemistry by continuous flow technology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Taming hazardous chemistry by continuous flow technology
This network shows the impact of Taming hazardous chemistry by continuous flow technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Taming hazardous chemistry by continuous flow technology.
About Taming hazardous chemistry by continuous flow technology
This paper, published in 2016, received 579 indexed citations . Written by Մ. Լ. Մովսիսյան, Elisabeth Delbeke, Jan Berton, Claudio Battilocchio, Steven V. Ley and Christian V. Stevens covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (450 citations), Organic Chemistry (305 citations) and Molecular Biology (145 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00902b.