Stimuli-responsive nanogel composites and their application in nanomedicine

437 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2015, received 437 indexed citations. Written by María Molina, Mazdak Asadian‐Birjand, Juan Balach, Julián Bergueiro, Enrico Miceli and Marcelo Calderón covering the research area of Molecular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (231 citations), Biomedical Engineering (207 citations) and Molecular Medicine (119 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.

Countries where authors are citing Stimuli-responsive nanogel composites and their application in nanomedicine

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stimuli-responsive nanogel composites and their application in nanomedicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stimuli-responsive nanogel composites and their application in nanomedicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stimuli-responsive nanogel composites and their application in nanomedicine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Stimuli-responsive nanogel composites and their application in nanomedicine

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Stimuli-responsive nanogel composites and their application in nanomedicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Stimuli-responsive nanogel composites and their application in nanomedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00199d.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026