Carbon capture with ionic liquids: overview and progress
- Journal
- Energy & Environmental Science
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/c2ee21152a →Countries where authors are citing Carbon capture with ionic liquids: overview and progress
This map shows the geographic impact of Carbon capture with ionic liquids: overview and progress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carbon capture with ionic liquids: overview and progress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carbon capture with ionic liquids: overview and progress more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Carbon capture with ionic liquids: overview and progress
This network shows the impact of Carbon capture with ionic liquids: overview and progress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Carbon capture with ionic liquids: overview and progress.
About Carbon capture with ionic liquids: overview and progress
This paper, published in 2012, received 739 indexed citations . Written by Xiangping Zhang, Xiaochun Zhang, Haifeng Dong, Zhijun Zhao, Suojiang Zhang and Ying Huang covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Mechanical Engineering and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Catalysis (516 citations), Mechanical Engineering (431 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (286 citations). Published in Energy & Environmental Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/c2ee21152a.