Halogen bonding: a general route in anion recognition and coordination
- Journal
- Chemical Society Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/b926232f →Countries where authors are citing Halogen bonding: a general route in anion recognition and coordination
This map shows the geographic impact of Halogen bonding: a general route in anion recognition and coordination. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Halogen bonding: a general route in anion recognition and coordination with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Halogen bonding: a general route in anion recognition and coordination more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Halogen bonding: a general route in anion recognition and coordination
This network shows the impact of Halogen bonding: a general route in anion recognition and coordination. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Halogen bonding: a general route in anion recognition and coordination.
About Halogen bonding: a general route in anion recognition and coordination
This paper, published in 2010, received 434 indexed citations . Written by Gabriella Cavallo, Pierangelo Metrangolo, Tullio Pilati, Giuseppe Resnati, Maurizio Sansotera and Giancarlo Terraneo covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (308 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (198 citations) and Organic Chemistry (168 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/b926232f.