“Frustrated Lewis pairs”: a concept for new reactivity and catalysis
- Authors
- Douglas W. Stephan
- Journal
- Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/b802575b →Countries where authors are citing “Frustrated Lewis pairs”: a concept for new reactivity and catalysis
This map shows the geographic impact of “Frustrated Lewis pairs”: a concept for new reactivity and catalysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by “Frustrated Lewis pairs”: a concept for new reactivity and catalysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites “Frustrated Lewis pairs”: a concept for new reactivity and catalysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing “Frustrated Lewis pairs”: a concept for new reactivity and catalysis
This network shows the impact of “Frustrated Lewis pairs”: a concept for new reactivity and catalysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the “Frustrated Lewis pairs”: a concept for new reactivity and catalysis.
About “Frustrated Lewis pairs”: a concept for new reactivity and catalysis
This paper, published in 2008, received 575 indexed citations . Written by Douglas W. Stephan covering the research area of Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (517 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (361 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (98 citations). Published in Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/b802575b.