Utilisation of CO2 as a chemical feedstock: opportunities and challenges
- Authors
- Michele ArestaAngela Dibenedetto
- Journal
- Dalton Transactions
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/b700658f →Countries where authors are citing Utilisation of CO2 as a chemical feedstock: opportunities and challenges
This map shows the geographic impact of Utilisation of CO2 as a chemical feedstock: opportunities and challenges. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Utilisation of CO2 as a chemical feedstock: opportunities and challenges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Utilisation of CO2 as a chemical feedstock: opportunities and challenges more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Utilisation of CO2 as a chemical feedstock: opportunities and challenges
This network shows the impact of Utilisation of CO2 as a chemical feedstock: opportunities and challenges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Utilisation of CO2 as a chemical feedstock: opportunities and challenges.
About Utilisation of CO2 as a chemical feedstock: opportunities and challenges
This paper, published in 2007, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Michele Aresta and Angela Dibenedetto covering the research area of Process Chemistry and Technology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Process Chemistry and Technology (961 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (681 citations) and Catalysis (362 citations). Published in Dalton Transactions.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/b700658f.