Towards understanding, control and application of layered double hydroxide chemistry

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 533 indexed citations. Written by Gareth R. Williams and Dermot O’Hare covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (491 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (105 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (96 citations). Published in Journal of Materials Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1039/b604895a →

Countries where authors are citing Towards understanding, control and application of layered double hydroxide chemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Towards understanding, control and application of layered double hydroxide chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Towards understanding, control and application of layered double hydroxide chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Towards understanding, control and application of layered double hydroxide chemistry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Towards understanding, control and application of layered double hydroxide chemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Towards understanding, control and application of layered double hydroxide chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Towards understanding, control and application of layered double hydroxide chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/b604895a.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026