A novel organic chromophore for dye-sensitized nanostructured solar cells
- Journal
- Chemical Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/b603002e →Countries where authors are citing A novel organic chromophore for dye-sensitized nanostructured solar cells
This map shows the geographic impact of A novel organic chromophore for dye-sensitized nanostructured solar cells. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A novel organic chromophore for dye-sensitized nanostructured solar cells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A novel organic chromophore for dye-sensitized nanostructured solar cells more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A novel organic chromophore for dye-sensitized nanostructured solar cells
This network shows the impact of A novel organic chromophore for dye-sensitized nanostructured solar cells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A novel organic chromophore for dye-sensitized nanostructured solar cells.
About A novel organic chromophore for dye-sensitized nanostructured solar cells
This paper, published in 2006, received 631 indexed citations . Written by Daniel P. Hagberg, Tomas Edvinsson, Tannia Marinado, Gerrit Boschloo, Anders Hagfeldt and Licheng Sun covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (565 citations), Materials Chemistry (437 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (102 citations). Published in Chemical Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/b603002e.