A water-soluble tetrazolium salt useful for colorimetric cell viability assay
- Journal
- Analytical Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/a809656b →Countries where authors are citing A water-soluble tetrazolium salt useful for colorimetric cell viability assay
This map shows the geographic impact of A water-soluble tetrazolium salt useful for colorimetric cell viability assay. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A water-soluble tetrazolium salt useful for colorimetric cell viability assay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A water-soluble tetrazolium salt useful for colorimetric cell viability assay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A water-soluble tetrazolium salt useful for colorimetric cell viability assay
This network shows the impact of A water-soluble tetrazolium salt useful for colorimetric cell viability assay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A water-soluble tetrazolium salt useful for colorimetric cell viability assay.
About A water-soluble tetrazolium salt useful for colorimetric cell viability assay
This paper, published in 1999, received 579 indexed citations . Written by Hideyuki Tominaga, Munetaka Ishiyama, Fumio Ohseto, Kazumi Sasamoto, Tomoyuki Hamamoto, Keiji Suzuki and Masami Watanabe covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Small Animals. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (249 citations), Biomedical Engineering (95 citations) and Organic Chemistry (80 citations). Published in Analytical Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/a809656b.