Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook
- Journal
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/srep37825 →Countries where authors are citing Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook
This map shows the geographic impact of Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook
This network shows the impact of Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook.
About Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook
This paper, published in 2016, received 324 indexed citations . Written by Michela Del Vicario, Gianna Vivaldo, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli and Walter Quattrociocchi covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (219 citations), Communication (126 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (111 citations). Published in IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/srep37825.