Reconfigurable Complementary Logic Circuits with Ambipolar Organic Transistors
- Journal
- Scientific Reports
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/srep35585 →Countries where authors are citing Reconfigurable Complementary Logic Circuits with Ambipolar Organic Transistors
This map shows the geographic impact of Reconfigurable Complementary Logic Circuits with Ambipolar Organic Transistors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reconfigurable Complementary Logic Circuits with Ambipolar Organic Transistors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reconfigurable Complementary Logic Circuits with Ambipolar Organic Transistors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reconfigurable Complementary Logic Circuits with Ambipolar Organic Transistors
This network shows the impact of Reconfigurable Complementary Logic Circuits with Ambipolar Organic Transistors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reconfigurable Complementary Logic Circuits with Ambipolar Organic Transistors.
About Reconfigurable Complementary Logic Circuits with Ambipolar Organic Transistors
This paper, published in 2016, received 494 indexed citations . Written by Hocheon Yoo, Matteo Ghittorelli, Edsger C. P. Smits, Gerwin H. Gelinck, Han-Koo Lee and Fabrizio Torricelli covering the research area of Polymers and Plastics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (126 citations), Biomedical Engineering (102 citations) and Materials Chemistry (99 citations). Published in Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/srep35585.