Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max)

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 372 indexed citations. Written by Ruiqiang Liu and Rattan Lal covering the research area of Environmental Chemistry, Plant Science and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (179 citations), Plant Science (141 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (130 citations). Published in Scientific Reports.

Countries where authors are citing Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max) more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/srep05686.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026