Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces
- Journal
- Scientific Reports
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/srep02546 →Countries where authors are citing Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces
This map shows the geographic impact of Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces
This network shows the impact of Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces.
About Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces
This paper, published in 2013, received 524 indexed citations . Written by Yong Li, Bin Liang, Zhongming Gu, Xin‐Ye Zou and Jian‐Chun Cheng covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Oceanography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (489 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (355 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (255 citations). Published in Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/srep02546.