Isolation and retrieval of circulating tumor cells using centrifugal forces
- Journal
- Scientific Reports
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/srep01259 →Countries where authors are citing Isolation and retrieval of circulating tumor cells using centrifugal forces
This map shows the geographic impact of Isolation and retrieval of circulating tumor cells using centrifugal forces. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Isolation and retrieval of circulating tumor cells using centrifugal forces with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isolation and retrieval of circulating tumor cells using centrifugal forces more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Isolation and retrieval of circulating tumor cells using centrifugal forces
This network shows the impact of Isolation and retrieval of circulating tumor cells using centrifugal forces. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Isolation and retrieval of circulating tumor cells using centrifugal forces.
About Isolation and retrieval of circulating tumor cells using centrifugal forces
This paper, published in 2013, received 595 indexed citations . Written by Han Wei Hou, Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani, Bee Luan Khoo, Zirui Li, Ross A. Soo, Daniel Shao-Weng Tan, Wan‐Teck Lim, Jongyoon Han, Ali Asgar S. Bhagat and Chwee Teck Lim covering the research area of Oncology and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (456 citations), Oncology (264 citations) and Cancer Research (135 citations). Published in Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/srep01259.