Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 4.2k indexed citations. Written by Hylke E. Beck, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, Tim R. McVicar, Noemi Vergopolan, Alexis Berg and Eric F. Wood covering the research area of Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (1.5k citations), Environmental Engineering (975 citations) and Ecology (779 citations). Published in Scientific Data.

Countries where authors are citing Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026