Innate immunity: the missing link in neuroprotection and neurodegeneration?
- Journal
- Nature reviews. Neuroscience
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nrn752 →Countries where authors are citing Innate immunity: the missing link in neuroprotection and neurodegeneration?
This map shows the geographic impact of Innate immunity: the missing link in neuroprotection and neurodegeneration?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Innate immunity: the missing link in neuroprotection and neurodegeneration? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Innate immunity: the missing link in neuroprotection and neurodegeneration? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Innate immunity: the missing link in neuroprotection and neurodegeneration?
This network shows the impact of Innate immunity: the missing link in neuroprotection and neurodegeneration?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Innate immunity: the missing link in neuroprotection and neurodegeneration?.
About Innate immunity: the missing link in neuroprotection and neurodegeneration?
This paper, published in 2002, received 571 indexed citations . Written by Minh Dang Nguyen, Jean‐Pierre Julien and Serge Rivest covering the research area of Neurology, Immunology and Biological Psychiatry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Neurology (313 citations), Immunology (201 citations) and Molecular Biology (141 citations). Published in Nature reviews. Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nrn752.