Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control
- Journal
- Nature Reviews Microbiology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3199 →Countries where authors are citing Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control
This map shows the geographic impact of Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control
This network shows the impact of Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control.
About Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control
This paper, published in 2014, received 505 indexed citations . Written by Calum Johnston, B. Martin, Gwennaële Fichant, Patrice Polard and J.P. Claverys covering the research area of Genetics, Molecular Biology and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (255 citations), Genetics (163 citations) and Ecology (142 citations). Published in Nature Reviews Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3199.