Deinococcus radiodurans — the consummate survivor
- Authors
- Michael M. CoxJohn R. Battista
- Journal
- Nature Reviews Microbiology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1264 →Countries where authors are citing Deinococcus radiodurans — the consummate survivor
This map shows the geographic impact of Deinococcus radiodurans — the consummate survivor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deinococcus radiodurans — the consummate survivor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deinococcus radiodurans — the consummate survivor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Deinococcus radiodurans — the consummate survivor
This network shows the impact of Deinococcus radiodurans — the consummate survivor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Deinococcus radiodurans — the consummate survivor.
About Deinococcus radiodurans — the consummate survivor
This paper, published in 2005, received 527 indexed citations . Written by Michael M. Cox and John R. Battista covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Genetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (361 citations), Genetics (149 citations) and Ecology (129 citations). Published in Nature Reviews Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1264.