High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 1.0k indexed citations. Written by James E. Kennedy covering the research area of Hepatology, Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (846 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (337 citations) and Materials Chemistry (246 citations). Published in Nature reviews. Cancer.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/nrc1591 →

Countries where authors are citing High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours more than expected).

Fields of papers citing High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nrc1591.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026