Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states
- Authors
- Chao‐Yang LuXiaoqi ZhouOtfried GühneWeibo GaoJin Zhang
- Journal
- Nature Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nphys507 →Countries where authors are citing Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states
This map shows the geographic impact of Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states
This network shows the impact of Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states.
About Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states
This paper, published in 2007, received 493 indexed citations . Written by Chao‐Yang Lu, Xiaoqi Zhou, Otfried Gühne, Weibo Gao, Jin Zhang, Zhen-Sheng Yuan, Alexander Goebel, Tao Yang and Jian-Wei Pan covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (457 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (442 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (44 citations). Published in Nature Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nphys507.