Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2
- Journal
- Nature Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nphys3203 →Countries where authors are citing Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2
This map shows the geographic impact of Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2
This network shows the impact of Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2.
About Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2
This paper, published in 2015, received 652 indexed citations . Written by Ajit Srivastava, Meinrad Sidler, Adrien Allain, Dominik Lembke, András Kis and Ataç Îmamoğlu covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (609 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (342 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (192 citations). Published in Nature Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nphys3203.