Zeeman-type spin splitting controlled by an electric field

457 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2013, received 457 indexed citations. Written by Hongtao Yuan, M. S. Bahramy, Kazuhiro Morimoto, Sanfeng Wu, Kentaro Nomura, Bohm-Jung Yang, Hidekazu Shimotani, Ryuji Suzuki, Minglin Toh and Christian Kloc covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (422 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (202 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (140 citations). Published in Nature Physics.

Countries where authors are citing Zeeman-type spin splitting controlled by an electric field

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zeeman-type spin splitting controlled by an electric field. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zeeman-type spin splitting controlled by an electric field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zeeman-type spin splitting controlled by an electric field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Zeeman-type spin splitting controlled by an electric field

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Zeeman-type spin splitting controlled by an electric field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Zeeman-type spin splitting controlled by an electric field.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nphys2691.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026