Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources
- Journal
- Nature Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nphys265 →Countries where authors are citing Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources
This map shows the geographic impact of Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources
This network shows the impact of Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources.
About Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources
This paper, published in 2006, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Franz Pfeiffer, Timm Weitkamp, Oliver Bunk and Christian Dávid covering the research area of Radiation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Radiation (1.3k citations), Biomedical Engineering (556 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (310 citations). Published in Nature Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nphys265.