Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase
- Journal
- Nature Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nphys199 →Countries where authors are citing Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase
This map shows the geographic impact of Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase
This network shows the impact of Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase.
About Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase
This paper, published in 2005, received 557 indexed citations . Written by J. Fuchs, P. Antici, E. d’Humières, E. Lefebvre, M. Borghesi, E. Brambrink, C. A. Cecchetti, Malte C. Kaluza, V. Malka and M. Manclossi covering the research area of Geophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (538 citations), Mechanics of Materials (393 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (294 citations). Published in Nature Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nphys199.