Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex
- Journal
- Nature Neuroscience
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nn896 →Countries where authors are citing Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex
This map shows the geographic impact of Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex
This network shows the impact of Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex.
About Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex
This paper, published in 2002, received 724 indexed citations . Written by Håkan Olausson, Y. Lamarre, Helena Backlund, Chantal Morin, B. Gunnar Wallin, Göran Starck, Sven Ekholm, Irina A. Strigo, Keith J. Worsley and Å. B. Vallbo covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (447 citations), Social Psychology (249 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (209 citations). Published in Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nn896.