Channelrhodopsin-2–assisted circuit mapping of long-range callosal projections

687 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 687 indexed citations. Written by Leopoldo Petreanu, Daniel Huber, Aleksander Sobczyk and Karel Svoboda covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (537 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (412 citations) and Molecular Biology (102 citations). Published in Nature Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/nn1891 →

Countries where authors are citing Channelrhodopsin-2–assisted circuit mapping of long-range callosal projections

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Channelrhodopsin-2–assisted circuit mapping of long-range callosal projections. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Channelrhodopsin-2–assisted circuit mapping of long-range callosal projections with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Channelrhodopsin-2–assisted circuit mapping of long-range callosal projections more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Channelrhodopsin-2–assisted circuit mapping of long-range callosal projections

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Channelrhodopsin-2–assisted circuit mapping of long-range callosal projections. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Channelrhodopsin-2–assisted circuit mapping of long-range callosal projections.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nn1891.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026