Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect
- Journal
- Nature Neuroscience
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nn1574 →Countries where authors are citing Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect
This map shows the geographic impact of Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect
This network shows the impact of Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect.
About Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect
This paper, published in 2005, received 646 indexed citations . Written by Maurizio Corbetta, Chris Lewis, Abraham Z. Snyder and Ayelet Sapir covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (608 citations), Neurology (114 citations) and Pharmacology (102 citations). Published in Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nn1574.