Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism

1.1k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2005, received 1.1k indexed citations. Written by Kim M. Dalton, Brendon M. Nacewicz, Tom Johnstone, Hillary S. Schaefer, Morton Ann Gernsbacher, H. Hill Goldsmith, Andrew L. Alexander and Richard J. Davidson covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (982 citations), Clinical Psychology (358 citations) and Genetics (230 citations). Published in Nature Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/nn1421 →

Countries where authors are citing Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nn1421.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026