Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies
- Journal
- Nature Methods
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nmeth953 →Countries where authors are citing Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies
This map shows the geographic impact of Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies
This network shows the impact of Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies.
About Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies
This paper, published in 2006, received 544 indexed citations . Written by Ulrich Rothbauer, Kourosh Zolghadr, С. В. Тиллиб, Danny Nowak, Lothar Schermelleh, Natalija Backmann, Katja Conrath, Serge Muyldermans, M. Cristina Cardoso and Heinrich Leonhardt covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Immunology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (428 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (246 citations) and Cell Biology (82 citations). Published in Nature Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth953.