mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 733 indexed citations. Written by Daphne S. Bindels, Lindsay Haarbosch, Laura van Weeren, Marten Postma, Katrin E. Wiese, Marieke Mastop, Sylvain Aumonier, Guillaume Gotthard, Antoine Royant and Mark A. Hink covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Structural Biology and Biophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (499 citations), Biophysics (168 citations) and Cell Biology (142 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging more than expected).

Fields of papers citing mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4074.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026