CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo

880 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2015, received 880 indexed citations. Written by Miguel A. Moreno-Mateos, Charles E. Vejnar, Jean-Denis Beaudoin, Juan Pablo Fernández, Emily K. Mis, Mustafa K. Khokha and Antonio J. Giráldez covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (794 citations), Genetics (154 citations) and Cell Biology (93 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3543.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026