Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 738 indexed citations. Written by Daesik Kim, Sangsu Bae, Jeongbin Park, Eunji Kim, Seokjoong Kim, Jinha Hwang, Jong‐Il Kim and Jin‐Soo Kim covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (723 citations), Genetics (176 citations) and Business and International Management (122 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3284.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026