Rapid adaptive optical recovery of optimal resolution over large volumes

198 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2014, received 198 indexed citations. Written by Kai Wang, Daniel E. Milkie, Ankur Saxena, Peter Engerer, Thomas Misgeld, Marianne Bronner‐Fraser, Jeff S. Mumm and Eric Betzig covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Biophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biophysics (148 citations), Biomedical Engineering (118 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (59 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Rapid adaptive optical recovery of optimal resolution over large volumes

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rapid adaptive optical recovery of optimal resolution over large volumes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rapid adaptive optical recovery of optimal resolution over large volumes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rapid adaptive optical recovery of optimal resolution over large volumes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Rapid adaptive optical recovery of optimal resolution over large volumes

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Rapid adaptive optical recovery of optimal resolution over large volumes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Rapid adaptive optical recovery of optimal resolution over large volumes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2925.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026